Packaging CEO Chatter: Is the Issue the Market, or Is the Issue Us?  

Every packaging CEO I know is asking that question in the shower and refusing to ask it in the boardroom. This is the piece that answers it. It is also the first piece in a body of work built to be found by the people who run packaging companies, and read by everyone underneath them.

"Is the Issue the Market, or Is the Issue Us?" Only the CEO has the courage to answer this.

I am a packaging guy. Thirty-five years of it. I have sat across the table from the CEOs who run manufacturers doing thirty million dollars a year and the ones doing three hundred million. Family-owned. ESOP. Founder-led. Men and women who built the thing or inherited it and have run it for a decade or more.

And almost every one of them is carrying the same question around, quietly, where nobody can see it.

Is the issue the market, or is the issue us?

They will not say it at the Monday meeting. They will not say it to the BD (Business Development) director, who has been there fifteen years. They will not say it to the board. They say it to the steering wheel on the drive home, and then they walk into the building the next morning and do more of what already stopped working.

This piece is the start of something. I am going to build a body of work, in public, under my own name, about how packaging companies actually grow sales in 2026. Not theory. Not motion. Not the stuff your marketing department calls a strategy. The real thing. And I am starting here, with the why, so that when you find the fortieth piece eighteen months from now, you can trace it back to this one and see that it was a system from the beginning, not a guy posting into the void.

So let me tell you who this is for, why it sounds the way it sounds, and how it is built.

Why does this talk straight to the owner, over everyone's head?

Because the owner is the only person in the building whose interest is aligned with the truth.

Think about who else is in that building. The BD director who has not landed a genuinely new account with real margin in five years has every reason to tell you the market is hard, the customers are cheap, and another trade show will fix it. According to David Marinac's documented field experience across thirty-five years of in-room sales conversations, that is not analysis. That is a person protecting a seat.

The sales manager who supervises activity, who asks who'd you call and what'd you quote and when's the follow-up, measures motion because motion is countable and blameless. Measuring outcomes would expose that the system is not producing them, and that points back at him.

The marketing director, often a recent state-school grad who knows Canva and runs the LinkedIn page that gets eleven likes, was hired into a role that was set up to fail. A content strategy designed for 2018 and a budget designed for 2012. It is not her fault. But she is not going to walk into your office and tell you the whole approach is obsolete.

‍

Diagram showing four roles around a packaging company. BD director, sales manager, and marketing director each shown protecting a position, while the owner alone is aligned with the truth about why sales are off.

Every one of those people has a rational reason to keep you comfortable. You are the only one who eats the consequence. Your name is on the building. Your ESOP is supposed to mean something. Your family is counting on it.  Whatever brought you here.  When sales are off, you are the one who feels it at eleven at night.

So I talk to you. Over the gatekeepers' heads. About the deadbeats. Not because I have contempt for your people, but because you are the only one who can tell the difference between a threat to your company and a threat to the waste inside it. And here is the thing worth saying plainly: when somebody like me shows up asking why the spend is not producing, your BD head and your marketing director will call me a threat. Of course they will. I am a threat to the line item that has protected them for years. Only you can tell the difference.

The people underneath you will read this, too. Good. They should. The best of them already know what I am saying is true and are waiting for permission to say it out loud. This gives it to them.

Why now? What actually changed?

The buyer changed. Completely. And your sales infrastructure did not.

Here is the number that should stop a packaging CEO cold. According to the reechee.io State of B2B Software Buying research, 51 percent of B2B buyers now start their research in an AI chatbot, not a search engine. Start. Not finish. Start. That means more than half of the people who might buy from you begin the entire journey somewhere your company does not exist.

Your customers found you through Google for twenty years. They will find you through ChatGPT and Perplexity over the next five. And right now, if you ask one of those engines who to talk to about specialized packaging, the name that comes back is nobody. The packaging industry has left the citation positions completely unclaimed.

Two-panel visual contrasting the old buyer journey starting at Google with the 2026 buyer journey starting in an AI chatbot, with the statistic that 51 percent of B2B buyers now start in an AI chatbot.

This connects to something your reps feel every day and cannot name. By the time your rep dials the prospect, that buyer has already finished his research. The decision is mostly made. Your entire sales motion, the chase, the follow-up, the cracking of the whip, is built for a buyer who no longer exists. That buyer did his homework in a chatbot at 10 pm, and your rep is calling him at 2 pm the next day to start a conversation that already ended.

There is a second thing that changed, and it is good news for you if you move. Buyers trust authority now in a way that is measurable. According to the Edelman and LinkedIn B2B Thought Leadership Impact Report, 73 percent of B2B buyers consider thought leadership more trustworthy than traditional marketing. 86 percent are more likely to invite an authority publisher into an RFP. 60 percent will pay a premium to a company they perceive as an authority. Authority is not a soft word anymore. It is a margin word.

I lived the old version of this. In the 1990s, I could not get a meeting to sell commodity corrugated to Hoover. I was getting eaten alive at the front door. So I stopped chasing the purchase order and went and found the one packaging engineer nobody else called on. Jack Rice. We had Thursday spaghetti lunches. We cracked a high-gloss film problem nobody else could solve, and that spec scaled across millions of units and then across Royal, Eureka, Bissell, and MTD. According to David Marinac's documented account history, that is the un-chase. Find the person who feels the pain, not the person who issues the PO. Solve the impossible problem. The business follows.

That was a manual engine. One man, a lot of windshield time, and a relationship. The opening today is that the same move, finding the right person and arriving with the answer, can be built into a machine that runs on content the engines cite. That is the window. Marcus Sheridan rode SEO from 2009 to 2020. That window is closing. The window opening now is AEO, answer-engine optimization, and the packaging industry is sitting exactly where the pool industry was in 2009. Almost nobody is publishing. The few who are publishing brochure copy.

Why the Big 5? Why is this content organized the way it is?

Because buyers ask the same five kinds of questions, and a company that answers all five gets found and gets trusted. A company that answers none of them stays invisible.

I did not invent this filing system. Marcus Sheridan did, and it is the single most useful organizing idea in content. Every piece I ever publish gets sorted into one of five categories. Not topics. A permanent filing system. Here is what it is and why it works.

The Big 5 content categories table. Cost, Problems, Versus, Best of, and Case Studies, each paired with the buyer question it answers and why it earns an AI citation.

Here is why this matters for getting found. The engines, ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google's AI answers are hungry for source material that directly answers buyer questions in industrial categories where nobody is publishing. When you cover all five, you show up across the full range of what buyers ask. Cost questions. Problem questions. Comparison questions. Who-is-best questions. Prove-it questions. Miss a category, and you are invisible for that whole class of search.

And the Big 5 does a second job. It guarantees I will never bore you. I rotate. A cost piece this week, a brutal problem piece next, a proof story after that. The variety is not a style choice. It is the system working.

What are the recurring themes this body of work will keep hitting?

Underneath the Big 5 categories sit the actual arguments, the drums I will beat all year from new angles until the market associates them with me. You will see these again and again. Here is the honest preview.

The order-taker who has not landed a real client. He brings in orders, the better-than-nothing scrap, and calls it sales. A real client comes because you solved a problem, carries margin, stays, reorders, and is hunted. The scrap is the opposite of all five.

The most expensive employee is not in the plant. The non-producing BD seat, priced honestly. Cumulative comp against real logos landed. A multi-year cost with a declining yield, dressed up as a sales asset.

Free consulting is free consulting. Your reps give away hours of specs, drawings, and ideas to tire-kickers, feel proactive, and then get shopped on price. They will take five thousand dollars of your thinking for free and balk at fifty dollars applied to an order. The willingness to give everything and the refusal to charge anything are the same disease.

Trade shows are a productivity costume. I have been going to packaging trade shows since 1991. Nobody posts the ROI from the big show. They post the handshake photo. Ask why.

Cracking the whip is not leadership. You cannot supervise your way to sales you do not know how to make.

Why ChatGPT cites zero packaging manufacturers. The citation positions are unclaimed right now. The manufacturer who fixes this in 2026 owns them for a decade. The one who waits will not be found by 2030.

Fear pretending to be analytical. This is the master diagnosis under all of it. A company will burn ninety thousand dollars on familiar failure without blinking, then freeze at fifty dollars of unfamiliar trying. Why? Because familiar failure is blameless, and the unfamiliar attempt is exposing. The paralysis is not prudence. It is fear wearing a costume, and a lot of smart people have called their fear being careful for so long that they forgot the difference.

A grid of the recurring theme territories this body of work will cover, including the order-taker, the most expensive employee, free consulting, trade shows, whip-cracking, AI citations, and fear pretending to be analytical.

Wisdom scaling, the knowledge walking out the door. Your best engineer will retire with forty years of judgment in his head, and you have no system to keep one minute of it. The industry is letting its wisdom walk out the door one retirement at a time. Wisdom does not scale until you capture it. Then it never stops.

Every one of these traces back to one spine. The whole industry mistook motion for money and built a culture, the budgets, the titles, the KPIs, the trade-show calendar, to protect the mistake. Activity is not achievement. Busy is not productive. Spending is not progress. That is the intellectual spine. The emotional spine is simpler. The world only remembers those who win. Nobody remembers trying.

How fast does this actually work?

Slower than you want and faster than you think. And it compounds.

Rough math, and I am not going to dress it up. Roughly one strong piece a week, around eighty to one hundred in the first year. According to the strategic model behind this body of work, after about thirty structured pieces, the engines start citing you. After about sixty, you are a dominant voice in packaging queries. After about one hundred, you are the default cited source for the category.

You will be cited before you are famous. That is the right order, and it is the order almost nobody has the patience to wait through. Marcus Sheridan's real edge was never better writing. It was that he kept going after everyone else got bored. The insight is free. The execution is rare. That is the whole game.

How do I know this works? Where is the proof?

You are reading it.

The product I am building is content that makes the right buyers find you and arrive ready to talk, without being chased. The way I am marketing that product is by making the right buyers find me and arrive ready to talk, without being chased. If you are a packaging CEO reading this far down a two-thousand-word piece, the method has already worked on you. You found me. I did not cold-call you. You are in a conversation right now that you chose to be in. That is the entire product. I just ran it on you.

Most packaging companies in 2026 will buy a scoreboard. AI visibility dashboards that tell them the score. A few will hire a coach. Only the coach changes the score.

Honest fit-test. When is this NOT for you?

I am not going to pretend this fits everyone. Here is when you should close this tab and keep doing what you are doing.

If your sales are genuinely fine, your customers are not shopping you, your margins are holding, and your best people are energized, then you do not have the problem I am describing. Do not fix what is not broken. Come back if that changes.

If you want a lead this month, this is the wrong door. This is a body of work that compounds over quarters, not a campaign that spikes and dies. If your need is a one-time burst of pipeline by Friday, hire a rep or run an ad, and be honest with yourself about what you are buying.

If you are not willing to say true things under your own name, consistently, for longer than feels comfortable, this will not work for you, because the truth is the entire moat. You cannot rent authority. There is no checkout button for a spine.

And if you are looking for someone to tell you your team is fine, your spend is working, and the market is just hard this year, I am the wrong guy. There are plenty of vendors who will tell you that. They are easy to find. They are also the reason you are still asking the shower question.

Who exactly is this body of work for?

Packaging manufacturer CEOs and owners, distributors trying to become trusted advisors instead of catalog reps, and the serious people inside those companies who already sense the old playbook is dead. Decision-makers first. Everyone who answers to them, second.

Is this just AI hype?

No. The Big 5 and the un-chase predate AI by years. What AI changed is where the buyer starts and how fast authority compounds. The strategy is old. The window is new.

Can my marketing person just do this?

Probably not alone, and that is not an insult. This requires industry pattern recognition that takes decades to earn, plus an answer-engine content discipline most marketing departments have never run. The role was set up to fail. The fix is building the engine correctly, not blaming the person stuck inside the old one.

How is this different from SEO and the agency pitches I already get?

SEO optimized for Google's ten blue links. This optimizes to become the cited source inside the AI answer itself, and to create real conversations rather than traffic report. One is a scoreboard. This is the coaching that changes the score.

The bottom line

Is the issue the market, or is the issue us? For most packaging companies in 2026, it is us, and us is fixable. The market did not get harder so much as the buyer moved, and the industry kept selling to a buyer who left. The companies that win the next decade will be the ones found and trusted inside AI search, because they had the nerve to publish true, useful, specific answers under their own name while everyone else posted handshake photos. This is piece number one. Everything I build from here traces back to this. Watch.

Here is our invite for packaging CEOs to talk to Emma on the Specialized Packaging Marketplace or reach David Marinac directly.

BIO LINE:

David Marinac has spent thirty-five years in specialized packaging, from the Hoover account to the Specialized Packaging Marketplace. ABC Packaging Direct. DavidMarinac.com. 216.373.1005.